Counting Principles

Context: FIT1058_MOC · the two atoms of counting — add for disjoint “or”, multiply for independent “and” · sizes of a disjoint union vs a Cartesian Product · refined by inclusion–exclusion and selection

Quick Revision

  • 🎯 Objective: parse the problem’s “or”/“and” structure ➔ disjoint alternatives ⟹ add; independent stages ⟹ multiply.
  • 📦 Core Components: Addition ➔ (disjoint) | Multiplication ➔ (independent).
  • ⚡ Key Constraint: each rule has a hypothesis — overlap breaks addition, dependence breaks multiplication.

📝 Core

1. Addition Principle (or, disjoint)

  • Statement ➔ choose one item from disjoint option sets ⟹ add: ; generally pairwise-disjoint.
  • Signature ➔ “one or the other, never both”; sequential loops ⟹ costs add ().
  • Casework basis ➔ generalises to a Set Partition: total = sum of disjoint class sizes.

2. Multiplication Principle (and, independent)

  • Statement ➔ successive independent stages with then options ⟹ ; outcomes are pairs of ; generally .
  • Signature ➔ “this and then that”; nested loops run times.
  • Repeated choice independent picks from options ⟹ (Counting Functions).

⚖️ Core Decision Matrix

SituationRuleLoop StructureBreaks When
disjoint alternatives (“or”)addsequentialoverlap ⟹ inclusion–exclusion
independent stages (“and”)multiplynesteddependence ⟹ falling factorial
repeated independent choice equal factorswithout replacement ⟹
disjoint covering classessum of class sizescaseworkclasses overlap

When It Flips: add for "or", multiply for "and". All of Selection (Counting Framework) (permutations, falling factorials, combinations) is built by composing these two rules.

⚠️ Common Mistakes

  • 💡 Overlap breaks addition ⟹ use ; the addition principle is the disjoint special case of inclusion–exclusion.
  • 💡 Dependence breaks multiplication ➔ if stage 2’s options shrink with stage 1 (selection without replacement), factors aren’t constant — that’s the falling factorial, not .

🧠 Active Recall